Guiding student improvement without individual feedback

6 min read
Feedback seems extremely powerful. It is 'among the most common features of successful teaching and learning' with an average effect size of 0.79, 'twice the average effect of all other schooling effects' (Hattie, 2012: pp.115-116). Such meta-analyses are problematic (see, for example, Wiliam, 2016) and more recent reviews have offered lower effect sizes, but the overall picture is clear: 'Good feedback can significantly improve learning processes and outcomes' (Shute, 2008). Anders Ericsson emphasises the importance of feedback and guided improvement in his work on expert performance: 'Deliberate practice involves feedback and modification of efforts in response to that feedback' (Ericsson and Pool, 2016: p.99). Providing effective feedback is problematic, however. 'While feedback is among the most powerful moderators of learning, its effects are among the most variable' (Hattie, 2012: p.115). Providing feedback successfully is a real challenge: 'Get it wrong, and students give up,

Join us or sign in now to view the rest of this page

You're viewing this site as a guest, which only allows you to view a limited amount of content.

To view this page and get access to all our resources, join the Chartered College of Teaching (it's £1 per year for trainee teachers and half price for ECTs) or log in if you're already a member.

This article was published in July 2017 and reflects the terminology and understanding of research and evidence in use at the time. Some terms and conclusions may no longer align with current standards. We encourage readers to approach the content with an understanding of this context.

      0 0 votes
      Please Rate this content
      0 Comments
      Oldest
      Newest Most Voted

      From this issue

      Impact Articles on the same themes