Why are early identification and intervention important for children developing atypically? A neuroscience perspective

Written By: Author(s):
6 min read
Professor Sam Wass, University of East London, UK In recent decades there has been a big international shift in education policy (LGA, 2019). It used to be the case that most funding was concentrated on the later stages of education. Increasingly, though, it is now being realised that in fact what children experience during the first few years of their development is not only as important as what happens during later childhood, but that it may even be more important in determining a child’s lifelong outcomes (LGA, 2019). In this article, we review the scientific evidence that has caused this shift of emphasis, in order to provide a primer so that practitioners working in the Early Years are aware of the scientific research into the importance of their field. We also offer some practical suggestions for practitioners working in Early Years about what to do with children who you think may be at risk of developing atypically. Evidence that Early Years development is especially im

Join us or sign in now to view the rest of this page

You're viewing this site as a guest, which only allows you to view a limited amount of content.

To view this page and get access to all our resources, join the Chartered College of Teaching (it's £1 per year for trainee teachers and half price for ECTs) or log in if you're already a member.

References
  • Antshel KM, Hargrave TM, Simonescu M et al. (2011) Advances in understanding and treating ADHD. BMC Medicine 9: 72.
  • Baron-Cohen S, Leslie AM and Frith U (1985) Does the autistic child have a ‘theory of mind’? Cognition 21(1): 37–46.
  • Bellis MA, Hughes K, Ford K et al. (2018) Adverse childhood experiences and sources of childhood resilience: A retrospective study of their combined relationships with child health and educational attendance. BMC Public Health 18(1): 1–12.
  • Berens AE, Jensen SKG and Nelson CA (2017) Biological embedding of childhood adversity: from physiological mechanisms to clinical implications. BMC medicine 15: 1–12.
  • Conway CC, Raposa EB, Hammen C et al. (2018) Transdiagnostic pathways from early social stress to psychopathology: A 20‐year prospective study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 59(8): 855–862.
  • Geva R and Feldman R (2008) A neurobiological model for the effects of early brainstem functioning on the development of behavior and emotion regulation in infants: Implications for prenatal and perinatal risk. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 49(10): 1031–1041.
  • Hodel AS (2018) Rapid infant prefrontal cortex development and sensitivity to early environmental experience. Developmental Review 48: 113–144.
  • Johnson MH (2015) Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Karmiloff-Smith A (1998) Development itself is the key to understanding developmental disorders. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2: 389–398.
  • Kessler RC, Angermeyer M, Anthony JC et al. (2007) Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of mental disorders in the World Health Organization’s World Mental Health Survey Initiative. World Psychiatry 6(3): 168.
  • Local Government Association (LGA) (2019) House of Commons Health and Social Care Committee Report: First 1000 days of life.
  • Richards M and Wadsworth MEJ (2004) Long term effects of early adversity on cognitive function. Archives of Disease in Childhood 89: 922–927.
  • van IJzendoorn MH, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ, Duschinsky R et al. (2020) Institutionalisation and deinstitutionalisation of children 1: A systematic and integrative review of evidence regarding effects on development. The Lancet Psychiatry 7(8): 703–720.
  • Wass SV (2021) The origins of effortful control: How early development within arousal/regulatory systems influences attentional and affective control. Developmental Review 61: 100978.
5 1 vote
Please Rate this content
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted

Other content you may be interested in