Bringing cognitive neuroscience into the classroom: Some challenges and many opportunities

Written by:
8 min read
TARA KIRAN KURRE, TEACHER EDUCATOR, AZIM PREMJI UNIVERSITY, INDIA Neuroscience, the study of the structures and functions of the brain, intrigues educators for its application in education. The insights provided by neuroscience on how we learn might help in planning effective pedagogies that will help teachers to create better learning experiences for students. However, several researchers argue that the bridge between neuroscience and education is too far. As Bruer (1997, p. 15) argued, ‘Neuroscience has discovered a great deal about neurons and synapses, but not nearly enough to guide educational practice.’ One of the challenges in the translation of neuroscience research to education, as Beale (2021) mentions, is that education is too complex and humanistic an affair, to which neuroscience research has little to offer (Perry et al., 2021). Another challenge is that education is not a branch of science, and therefore direct translation of theory to application in education is d

Join us or sign in now to view the rest of this page

You're viewing this site as a guest, which only allows you to view a limited amount of content.

To view this page and get access to all our resources, join the Chartered College of Teaching (it's £1 per year for trainee teachers and half price for ECTs) or log in if you're already a member.

    • Beale J (2021) Educational neuroscience and educational neuroscientism. In: Harrington J, Beale J, Fancourt A et al. (eds) The ‘BrainCanDo’ Handbook of Teaching and Learning. London: Routledge, pp. 36–54.
    • Bloom BM (1968) Learning for mastery. Center for the Study of Evaluation of Instructional Programs 1: 1–12.
    • Bruer JT (1997) Education and the brain: A bridge too far. Educational Researcher 26(8): 4–16.
    • Carroll JB (1963) A model of school learning. Teachers College Record 64(8): 723–733.
    • Casey BJ, Getz S and Galvan A (2008) The adolescent brain. Developmental Review 28(1): 62–77.
    • Darling-Hammond L, Flook L, Cook-Harvey C et al. (2020) Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science 24(2): 97–140.
    • Eiland L and Romeo RD (2013) Stress and the developing adolescent brain. Neuroscience 249: 162–171.
    • Erdem A (2017) Mind maps as a lifelong learning tool. Universal Journal of Educational Research 5(12): 1–7.
    • Fuhrmann D, Knoll L and Blakemore SJ (2015) Adolescence as a Sensitive Period of Brain Development. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 19(10): 558–566.
    • Goldsmith HH, Pollack S and Davidson RJ (2008) Developmental neuroscience perspectives on emotion regulation. Child Development Perspectives 2: 132–140.
    • Goswami U (2004) Neuroscience and education. British Journal of Educational Psychology 74(1):1–14.
    • Goswami U (2008) Principles of learning, implications for teaching: A cognitive neuroscience perspective. Journal of Philosophy of Education 42(3–4): 381–399.
    • Hall GS (1904) Adolescence: Its Psychology and its Relations to Physiology, Anthropology, Sociology, Sex, Crime, Religion and Education, Vol. 1. New York: D Appleton & Company.
    • Hampton FM (1997) Enhancing Urban Student Achievement Through Multi-Year Assignment and Family-Oriented School Practices. ERS Spectrum 15(2): 7–15.
    • Knight FLC (2021) Sleepy teens in the classroom. In: Harrington J, Beale J, Fancourt A et al. (eds) The ‘BrainCanDo’ Handbook of Teaching and Learning. London: Routledge, pp. 36–54.
    • Masten AS, Hubbard JJ, Gest SD et al. (1999) Competence in the context of adversity: Pathways to resilience and maladaptation from childhood to late adolescence. Development and Psychopathology 11: 143–169.
    • Perry T, Lea R, Jørgensen CR et al. (2021) Cognitive science approaches in the classroom. Education Endowment Foundation. Available at: https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/education-evidence/evidence-reviews/cognitive-science-approaches-in-the-classroom (accessed 9 August 2024).
    • Tarokh L, Saletin JM and Carskadon MA (2016) Sleep in adolescence: Physiology, cognition and mental health. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 70: 182–188.
    • Thompson JL and Nelson AJ (2011) Middle childhood and modern human origins. Human Nature 22(3): 249–280.
    • Tottenham N and Galván A (2016) Stress and the adolescent brain. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 70: 217–227.
    • Whiting SB, Wass SV, Green S et al. (2021) Stress and learning in pupils: Neuroscience evidence and its relevance for teachers. Mind, Brain and Education 15(2): 177–188.
    • Wiliam D (2019) Dylan Wiliam: Teaching not a research-based profession. Tes Magazine, 30 May, 19. Available at: www.tes.com/news/dylan-wiliam-teaching-not-research-based-profession (accessed 3 July 2024).
    • Yilmaz K (2011) The cognitive perspective on learning: Its theoretical underpinnings and implications for classroom practices. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas 84(5): 204–212.
    • Zenner C, Herrnleben-Kurz S and Walach H (2014) Mindfulness-based interventions in schools – a systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology 5(603): 1–20.
    0 0 votes
    Please Rate this content
    0 Comments
    Oldest
    Newest Most Voted

    From this issue

    Impact Articles on the same themes