Teacher of Physics, Frankfurt International School
I was introduced to single point rubrics (SPRs) a few years ago, initially trialling them before dismissing them as a useful tool. My introduction was an assessment rubric levelled for a mid-level student that ‘could be used for any/every student’. Assessing every student against a single statement felt like a rapid return to the 1900s. However, I could see real value in the layout, having observed students getting lost in huge assessment rubrics designed to separate different levels across numerous strands. I suspect that all teachers have seen assessments where the rubrics are longer than the task or contain more words than the work submitted.
My colleagues and I returned to SPRs later, trying several different versions. Following these iterations, I wanted a more concrete picture of how my students felt about them. Over the last four months, I used SPRs instead of the usual detailed criteria for two classes that I had not ta
Join us or sign in now to view the rest of this page
You're viewing this site as a guest, which only allows you to view a limited amount of content.
To view this page and get access to all our resources, join the Chartered College of Teaching (it's free for trainee teachers and half price for NQTs) or log in if you're already a member.