Can retrieval practice improve student performance within an A-level psychology classroom?
Written by: Lydia Marsh
9 min read
LYDIA MARSH, CHRIST THE KING CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL AND SIXTH FORM CENTRE; MA STUDENT, LIVERPOOL HOPE UNIVERSITY, UK
Introduction
As with other A-level subjects, psychology students require learning strategies that help them to both remember and effectively apply large volumes of complex course content to unseen questions, as their learning is ultimately evaluated by their performance in summative assessments.
Influential research by Roediger and Karpicke (2006) suggests that retrieval practice (in the form of low-stakes practice tests) is a more effective learning strategy for improving students’ performance in assessments than simply restudying. Since then, a growing body of research has shown that retrieval practice is highly effective when compared to many other learning strategies (Dunlosky et al., 2013; Donoghue and Hattie, 2021). Additionally, recent meta-analyses (Yang et al., 2021; Agarwal et al., 2021) report that the beneficial effects of retrieval practice can be trans
Join us or sign in now to view the rest of this page
You're viewing this site as a guest, which only allows you to view a limited amount of content.
To view this page and get access to all our resources, join the Chartered College of Teaching (it's free for trainee teachers and half price for NQTs) or log in if you're already a member.
- Adesope OO, Trevisan DA and Sundararajan N (2017) Rethinking the use of tests: A meta-analysis of practice testing. Review of Educational Research 87(3): 659–701.
- Agarwal PK, Nunes LD and Blunt JR (2021) Retrieval practice consistently benefits student learning: A systematic review of applied research in schools and classrooms. Educational Psychology Review 33(4):1409–1453.
- Donoghue GM and Hattie JA (2021) A meta-analysis of ten learning techniques. Frontiers in Education 6(581216): 1–9.
- Dunlosky J, Rawson KA, Marsh EJ et al.(2013) Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public interest 14(1): 4–58.
- Eisenkraemer RE, Jaeger A and Stein LM (2013) A systematic review of the testing effect in learning. Paidéia 23(56): 397–406.
- Pan SC and Rickard TC (2018) Transfer of test-enhanced learning: Meta-analytic review and synthesis. Psychological Bulletin 144(7): 710–756.
- Perry T, Lea R, Jørgensen CR et al. (2021) Cognitive science in the classroom: Evidence and practice review. Education Endowment Foundation. Available at: https://d2tic4wvo1iusb.cloudfront.net/production/documents/guidance/Cognitive_Science_in_the_classroom_-_Evidence_and_practice_review.pdf?v=1699799699 (accessed 20 September 2023).
- Roediger III HL and Karpicke JD (2006) Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science 17(3): 249–255.
- Rowland CA (2014) The effect of testing versus restudy on retention: A meta-analytic review of the testing effect. Psychological Bulletin 140(6): 1432–1463.
- Trumbo M, McDaniel MA, Hodge GK et al. (2021) Is the testing effect ready to be put to work? Evidence from the laboratory to the classroom. Translational Issues in Psychological Science 7(3): 332–355.
- Van Gog T and Sweller J (2015) Not new, but nearly forgotten: The testing effect decreases or even disappears as the complexity of learning materials increases. Educational Psychology Review 27: 247–264.
- Yang C, Luo L, Vadillo MA et al. (2021) Testing (quizzing) boosts classroom learning: A systematic and meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin 147(4): 399–435.
Subscribe
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Oldest
