Teachers’ understanding of neuromyths: A role for educational neuroscience in teacher training.

6 min read
Yasin Arslan, PhD Candidate, Department of Psychology and Human Development, University College London  Rebecca Gordon, Associate Professor of Cognitive Psychology, Department of Psychology and Human Development, University College London  Andy Tolmie, Professor of Developmental Psychology, Department of Psychology and Human Development, University College London  Introduction Teachers in the UK must complete a degree and an initial teacher training (ITT) programme to gain qualified teacher status (QTS). Broadly, these programmes train teachers to understand the curriculum, plan, structure and teach lessons, use assessment and manage behaviour. In addition to teachers’ existing knowledge and teaching skills, there is increasing evidence that an understanding of the brain systems and processes involved in learning can assist and influence teachers in developing optimal teaching practices (Howard-Jones et al., 2020; Brick et al., 2021), especially for children with special educa

Join us or sign in now to view the rest of this page

You're viewing this site as a guest, which only allows you to view a limited amount of content.

To view this page and get access to all our resources, join the Chartered College of Teaching (it's £1 per year for trainee teachers and half price for ECTs) or log in if you're already a member.

    • Blanchette Sarrasin J, Riopel M and Masson S (2019) Neuromyths and their origin among teachers in Quebec. Mind, Brain, and Education 13(2): 100–109.
    • Brick K, Cooper JL, Mason L et al. (2021) Tiered neuroscience and mental health professional development in Liberia improves teacher self-efficacy, self-responsibility, and motivation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 15: 664730.
    • Centre for Educational Neuroscience (2021) NeuroSENse Resources. Available at: www.educationalneuroscience.org.uk/neurosense-resources (accessed 26 March 2022).
    • Feiler JB and Stabio ME (2018) Three pillars of educational neuroscience from three decades of literature. Trends in Neuroscience and Education 13: 17–25.
    • Gabrieli JDE (2016) The promise of educational neuroscience: Comment on Bowers (2016). Psychological Review 123(5): 613–619.
    • Gini S, Knowland V, Thomas MSC et al. (2021) Neuromyths about neurodevelopmental disorders: Misconceptions by educators and the general public. Mind, Brain, and Education 15(4): 289–298.
    • Howard-Jones P, Jay T and Galeano L (2020) Professional development on the science of learning and teachers’ performative thinking – a pilot study. Mind, Brain, and Education 14(3): 267–278.
    • Macdonald K, Germine L, anderson A et al. (2017) Dispelling the myth: Training in education or neuroscience decreases but does not eliminate beliefs in neuromyths. Frontiers in Psychology 8: 1314.
    • Papadatou-Pastou M, Haliou E and Vlachos F (2017) Brain knowledge and the prevalence of neuromyths among prospective teachers in Greece. Frontiers in Psychology 8: 804.
    • Parvizi J, Jacques C, Foster BL et al. (2012) Electrical stimulation of human fusiform face-selective regions distorts face perception. Journal of Neuroscience 32(43): 14915–14920.
    • Privitera AJ (2021) A scoping review of research on neuroscience training for teachers. Trends in Neuroscience and Education 24: 100157. A
    • Rogowsky BA, Calhoun BM and Tallal P (2020) Providing instruction based on students’ learning style preferences does not improve learning. Frontiers in Psychology 11: 164.
    • Tan YSM and Amiel JJ (2022) Teachers learning to apply neuroscience to classroom instruction: Case of professional development in British Columbia. Professional Development in Education 48(1): 70–87.
    • Tardif E, Doudin P-A and Meylan N (2015) Neuromyths among teachers and student teachers. Mind, Brain, and Education 9(1): 50–59.
    • Thomas MSC, Ansari D and Knowland VCP (2019) Annual research review: Educational neuroscience: Progress and prospects. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 60(4): 477–492.
    • Tokuhama-Espinosa T (2018) Neuromyths: Debunking False Ideas About the Brain, 1st ed. New York: WW Norton & Company.
    0 0 votes
    Please Rate this content
    0 Comments
    Oldest
    Newest Most Voted

    From this issue

    Impact Articles on the same themes