Improving engagement and raising attainment through mixed ability grouping and cooperative learning

Written By: Author(s): Rosalyn Mark
8 min read
Cooperative Learning and mixed ability grouping to improve engagement and raise attainment
In recent years, there has been much interest in the potential benefits of both group work and of mixed attainment grouping, but also recognition that these are hard to get right and that they may also have negative consequences. In this article, the author reflects on a piece of action research she undertook to understand whether using cooperative learning structures, with pupils sitting in mixed ability groups, led to all pupils making good progress.  Action research in action In my action research project, I was keen to consider the following question: If pupils sit in mixed ability groups and I use cooperative learning structures, will they all make good progress? In line with Hattie’s (2012) observations, I had noticed lower ability children in my class not participating fully from the start of lessons and then sitting back passively, anticipating the support of an adult. Others lacked confidence, needing more time to process answers or were fearful of making mistakes. The

Join us or sign in now to view the rest of this page

You're viewing this site as a guest, which only allows you to view a limited amount of content.

To view this page and get access to all our resources, join the Chartered College of Teaching (it's free for trainee teachers and half price for ECTs) or log in if you're already a member.

This article was published in September 2019 and reflects the terminology and understanding of research and evidence in use at the time. Some terms and conclusions may no longer align with current standards. We encourage readers to approach the content with an understanding of this context.

References
  • Hattie J (2012) Visible Learning for Teachers. London: Routledge.
  • Johnson DW et al. (1994) New Circles of Learning. Alexandria: Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development.
  • Kagan S and Kagan M (2009) Kagan Cooperative Learning. Calle Amanecer: Kagan Publishing.
  • Kohn A (1993) Punished by Rewards. Orlando: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Macbeath J and Dempster (2009) Connected Leadership and Learning – principles for practice. London: Routledge.
  • Marshall M (2007) Discipline Without Stress, Punishments or Rewards. California: Piper Press.
0 0 votes
Please Rate this content
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Other content you may be interested in